FCP (First Contentful Paint)
The time from page load to when the first piece of DOM content (text/image/svg) is rendered. It’s an early signal that “something is happening.”
Good target: ≤ 1.8s on mobile.
Free tool
Run Google PageSpeed on any URL, see Core Web Vitals, and spot quick wins. Built by LoadTime Labs.
Speed reduces bounce, increases engagement, and improves conversion. Google rewards better page experience, so improving LCP, CLS, and responsiveness can directly support higher rankings and revenue.
The time from page load to when the first piece of DOM content (text/image/svg) is rendered. It’s an early signal that “something is happening.”
Good target: ≤ 1.8s on mobile.
When the largest above-the-fold element (hero image, big heading, etc.) becomes visible. It represents perceived loading speed.
Good target: ≤ 3s on mobile.
Measures unexpected layout shifts during load. Low CLS means elements don’t jump around while users read or tap.
Good target: ≤ 0.10.
Captures overall responsiveness to user interactions (clicks, taps, key presses). INP replaced FID as the responsiveness vital.
Good target: ≤ 200ms.
The time for the browser to receive the first byte from your server or CDN. High TTFB often points to slow server processing, cold starts, or poor caching.
Good target: ≤ 0.8s (mobile). Aim for lower on well-cached pages.
90–100 is Good (green), 50–89 needs improvement (orange), and 0–49 is Poor (red). Aim for green on both Mobile and Desktop.
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS), and Interaction to Next Paint (INP). These are key UX signals that affect both users and SEO.
Yes. Page experience and Core Web Vitals are ranking signals. Faster sites typically see better crawl efficiency, rankings, and conversions.
Mobile emulates slower devices and networks. Heavy JavaScript, large images, and render-blocking resources affect Mobile more.
Compress/resize images (WebP/AVIF), lazy-load offscreen media, remove unused CSS/JS, reduce third-party scripts, enable CDN + caching, and split heavy bundles.
It’s a tool that analyzes your website's speed, Core Web Vitals, and technical performance to help you identify and fix issues slowing down your site.
Scores are based on Google's Lighthouse and real-user data when available. Lab data may not fully reflect live user conditions but is great for spotting bottlenecks.
It can. While speed is just one ranking factor, improved performance enhances user experience, which positively affects engagement, bounce rates, and SEO.
Always prioritize Mobile. Google uses mobile-first indexing, and most users now browse on smartphones. A strong mobile experience benefits all users.
Scores vary due to network conditions, device emulation, server response times, and background processes. It’s best to test multiple times or use field data for consistency.
Yes, it checks LCP, CLS, and INP based on real-time Lighthouse metrics and helps you track and improve them over time.
Not always. Many improvements—like image compression, lazy-loading, or reducing plugins—can be done with plugins or tools. For advanced fixes, developer help may be needed.
Absolutely. A faster site keeps users engaged, reduces bounce rates, and increases conversion rates—especially on e-commerce or landing pages.
Lab data is simulated in a controlled environment (via Lighthouse), while field data reflects real user experiences. Both are valuable for performance analysis.
At least monthly or after major updates. Continuous monitoring is ideal, especially for high-traffic or revenue-generating websites.
We optimize Core Web Vitals for Next.js, WordPress, and Shopify.